Spotlight on sunlight

October 2018

A recent poll shows that close to 90 per cent of South Australians want planning regulations changed to protect their access to sunlight. This figure shows that there is a public revolt against a negative impact of poor quality infill development.

At present, under guidelines issued by the old Department of Planning and now enshrined in many councils’ development plans, when new developments are assessed, next-door neighbours are only entitled to two hours of sunlight on half of their backyards between 9am and 3pm on the shortest day of the year. They are also only entitled to three hours of sunlight on north-facing windows over part of their surface between 9am and 5pm on the shortest day of the year.

The public opinion poll shows that people feel that access to adequate sunlight is not strongly supported in our planning system. They are right. Housing densification has been a priority for successive state governments.

Residents should lobby their elected representatives, including Planning Minister Stephan Knoll, so that they and their children are not left languishing in the shadows of neighbouring developments.

 Cr Evonne Moore, City of Norwood, Payneham

Protect our animals

September 2018

Australia's environment laws are not adequate for stopping the decline of nearly one in three of our unique mammal, bird and marine species.

September 7 was Threatened Species Day.

Since European settlement, hundreds of species have been driven to extinction in Australia.

The growth of the human population and land clearing has contributed to large-scale habitat destruction for animal agriculture, mining, and urban sprawl.

Land clearing is destroying forests and animal factory runoff is polluting waterways.

This is also due to commercial and recreational hunting, and overharvesting in the case of fishing.

Serious investigation and effort is required by our State and Federal Environment Ministers in order to preserve what is left of Australia’s unique wildlife and tourism opportunities.

We need a national plan with states working together to achieve this.

Diane Cornelius

Whales and an exciting scientific finding.

George Monbiot, Chris Bryan and Maggillivray Freeman of  Sustainable Human.


One of the most exciting scientific findings of the past half century has been the discovery of widespread trophic cascades. A trophic cascade is an ecological process which starts at the top of the food chain and tumbles all the way down to the bottom.

We all know that whales eat fish and krill, and some people – certain politicians in Japan for example - have argued that killing whales would be good for human beings, as it would boost the food available for us to eat. And so you would think.

But as the great whales declined, so did the numbers of fish and krill. It seems counter-intuitive: surely their numbers would rise as their major predators disappeared? But it now turns out that whales not only eat these animals; they also keep them alive. In fact they help to sustain the entire living system of the oceans.


Whales feed at depth, in waters that are often pitch dark. Then they return to the surface: to the photic zone, where there's enough light for photosynthesis to happen. There they release what biologists call fecal plumes: vast outpourings of poo; poonamis. These plumes are rich in iron and nitrogen, nutrients which are often very scarce in the surface waters.

And these nutrients fertilize the plant plankton that lives in the only place where plants can survive ..... the photic zone.

Fertilizing the surface waters is not the only thing the whales do. By plunging up and down through the water column, they also keep kicking the plankton back up into the photic zone, giving it more time to reproduce before it sinks into the abyss. Even today, though whale populations have been greatly reduced, the vertical mixing of water caused by movements of animals up and down through the column of the oceans is, astonishingly, roughly the same as the amount of mixing caused by all the world's wind and waves and tides.

More plant plankton means more animal plankton, on which larger creatures then feed. In other words, more whales means more fish and krill.

But the story doesn't end here, because plant plankton not only feeds the animals of the sea; it also absorbs carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

When, eventually, it sinks to the ocean floor, it takes this carbon out of circulation, down to a place where it remains for many thousands of years.

The more whales there are, the more plankton there is. The more plankton there is, the more carbon is drawn out of the air.

When whales were at their historic populations, before their numbers were reduced, it seems that whales might have been responsible for removing tens of millions of tonnes of carbon from the atmosphere every year. Whales change the climate.

The return of the great whales, if they are allowed to recover, could be seen as a benign form of geo-engineering. It could undo some of the damage we have done, both to the living systems of the sea, and to the atmosphere.